Friday, September 3, 2010

Good News in CA Marriage Equality Battle

     A California court has refused to order Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown to appeal a ruling that overturned the state's gay marriage ban.
     The 3rd District Court of Appeal on Wednesday denied a conservative legal group's request to force the officials to defend voter-approved Proposition 8.

Montana Tea Party President Jokes about Matthew Shepherd's Murder, Inspires Terror

     Those in the Tea Party and on the Right generally fight hate crimes legislation.  Despite their efforts, Congress passed the Matthew Shepherd and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.  President Obama signed it into law in October.   

     Because he was black, James Byrd, Jr. was tied to truck by white supremacists and dragged until his arm and head were ripped off.    Because he was gay, Matthew Shepherd was pistol-whipped, tortured, and then hung upon a rural Wyoming fence (Where did his murders get the idea to hang him on something?) where he remained for eighteen hours.  He was discovered in a coma and died days later.  

     Here is the disgusting face of the hatred that is pumping through the heart of the nearly monochromatic Christian Tea Party:

     Tim Ravndal, the President of Montana's Big Sky Tea Party Association, expressed his views that marriage should be between a man and a woman in a Facebook posting. The post was in response to an ACLU lawsuit in Montana brought by seven gay couples who want to get married.
     Then Ravndal expressed support for a commenter who (in apparent reference to the Matthew Shepard murder) said, "I think fruits are decorative. Hang up where they can be seen and appreciated. Call Wyoming for display instructions."
     Answered Ravndal: "Where can I get that Wyoming printed instruction manual?" 
     This may be their free speech, but to every LGBT person in the nation, these threatening words are not free speech, they are terrorist acts.  

     Ravndal and others in the Tea Party make these statements, not because they can, but because they want to remind those of us who are gay, transgender, black, Muslim, or immigrant, that historically, they have power on their side.  They are the masters and we their bitches.  They would hang us, if not on their walls, then on their rural fence posts.  They would drag us from vehicles.

     This is the hateful face of the Tea Party's "real America."
Image from Towleroad

Thursday, September 2, 2010

Bible Believing Christians Gather in Rural Pennsylvania to Discuss Literally Bashing LGBT Persons

     Embedded in the video below is the face of Sarah Palin's "real America" gathered at Coudersport Public Library in rural Pensylvania for local "Bible Believing Christian" Robert Wagner's response to Out in the Silence, a documentary about being gay in rural America.

     Diane Gramley sat peacefully behind Robert Wagner in the Coudersport Public Library as the retired physician shared his views on transgender individuals with the assembled audience. “I'm gonna put a ball bat in my car,” he said, “and if I ever see a guy [Wagner refuses to use proper pronouns] coming out of a bathroom that my granddaughter's in, I'm gonna use the ball bat on him.” Moments later he added: “In the good old days, before 'she-males' existed, they just called such people perverts.”
     Gramley is no stranger to such ideas. As President of the Pennsylvania Chapter of the American Family Association, a 'traditional family values' organization based in Mississippi, she spends much of her time planting similar seeds of suspicion about the dangers posed by “men who think they are women,” her disparaging term for transgender females. She also crusades relentlessly against what she and the AFA call the “homosexual agenda” and the type of legal protections that her and Dr. Wagner's threatening rhetoric suggests are needed for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people.
    Watch the video below.  About half way through the video (around 3:00) Joe stands and addresses the gathered bigots.  He's a brave man. 

NOM Is Lying for their god to Discredit Judge Walker

     The National Organization for Marriage (NOM), not to be confused with this NOM, recently released an ad attacking the Federal Court's decision in Perry vs. Schwarzenegger that declared California Proposition 8 unconstitutional.  NOM's ad is full of lies.

     I often feel helpless in the face of these lies.  It's overwhelming to see these lies treated as valid argument in television commercials, news reports, and on the internet.  NOM has already claimed that it is their god-given right to take away others' civil rights.  This Christian group believe that since their god is for them, no one can be against them.  This delusion is the basis of their entitlement, the illusion that feeds their belief that lying for their version of their god's will is holy.

     The Federal Court's decision, authored by Judge Walker, systematically, legally, and constitutionally dismantles these lies.  The lies don't hold up in court.

     As a response, NOM released the new ad, full of homophobic lies, trying to discredit Judge Walker.

     Here is a succinct response from the folks at Stop8.org that confronts and disproves each of the lies in the NOM ad.  Thank you, Stop8.org.

Stop Female Genital Cutting

     People commit numerous atrocities in the names of their gods.  One of the worst is the circumcision/mutilation of children and infants' genitals.  
     Here's a report and plea for help from Change.org:
Across parts of Africa, the Middle East and Asia, the following scene is replayed over and over: A girl, often between 4 and 12 years old, is held down by three or four women while all or part of her external and internal genitalia is cut off.  
Complications from this brutal procedure can include severe hemorrhaging, infection, long-term difficulties with intercourse and childbirth, and even death.
Female genital cutting (FGC) reflects deep-rooted inequality between the sexes, and is recognized internationally as a violation of the human rights of girls and women.
Urge Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to do all she can to encourage the governments of the countries where this practice takes place to put a stop to it.
More than 100 million women and girls worldwide are affected by different forms of cutting. Infibulation is the most severe form, where some or all of the external genitalia are cut, leaving only a very small opening for urination and menstruation.
The practice of female genital cutting is hard to talk about. But ignoring it only guarantees more suffering, and leadership from the United States would go a long way in urging the countries where FGC occurs to end this human rights abuse.
Nearly three million young girls are at risk of female genital cutting this year alone. Please take action and help save these girls from a lifetime of pain and suffering.

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Hell Flow Chart



Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Vianney Renewal Center (Club Ped) Exposed, Fr. Mustache Missing

     When priests in the Midwest are accused of sexually abusing children or sexually exploiting adults under their care, one of the places they are sent is Vianney Renewal Center, near St. Louis, Missouri, which is run by the Servants of the Paraclete.

     This center has been the recent target of a news investigation by KSDK, after a previous employee spoke about the center's pedophile residents, many of whom avoided prison by going to Vianney.  These priest-perpetrators are allowed  to wander unsupervised, to hang out in a jacuzzi, and to view the pornography of their choosing.

     After I came forward to my archbishop with sexual abuse allegations, my perpetrator, Fr. Mustache, was quietly sent for a psychological assessment at a place for priests who'd failed in their celibate commitments.  The place was in St. Louis.  

     I know that Fr. Mustache admitted to the archbishop that my accusation was true, but how this was worded, I don't know.  He may have played the perpetrator-tested "the kid seduced me card."  When I inquired about what he'd said, the archbishop barked that it was none of my business.  He had professional boundaries to maintain, of course, in order to protect Fr. Mustache, who'd violated all of my personal boundaries, repeatedly.  

     Fr. Mustache's admission came during the first few days of February 2004.  He was allowed to return to his campus ministry position until mid-March, before he was sent to St. Louis for his assessment.  During those months, he had access to the college boys that I'd seen him grooming just as he had me.   After Spring break, he returned to ministry without anyone knowing he'd been whisked off to St. Louis.  I don't know what the mysterious place in St. Louis concluded in Fr. Mustache's assessment.  I was told by the archbishop's go-between that it was none of my business.

     The last time I saw Fr. Mustache was in May 2004 at the annual archdiocesan summer gathering of priests.  Trapped between two priests in the middle of a pew during evening prayer,  I fought off a panic attack when I saw him leading the gathered clerics in music at the front of the chapel.  At the dinner that followed, Fr. Mustache received a standing ovation from his brother priests when the archbishop thanked him for his campus ministry leadership and promoted him to a position having something to do with being the head of Catholic identity in the schools.  The only priests not standing were those in my priest support group, who knew the truth of what had been covered up.

     This morning, I looked up the phone number of one of my old support group friends on the archdiocesan webpage, where I discovered that Fr. Mustache is no longer in his campus ministry position.  He's currently receiving mail c/o of a religious order in St. Louis, MO.  I don't know where he is or what he's doing there.

     I'm fairly certain that I wasn't his only victim. 

    If you are also a victim of Fr. Mustache, please, feel free contact me at gospelaccordingtohate@gmail.com.  You are not alone.

Here are the KSDK reports on the Vianney Renewal Center 

Monday, August 30, 2010

Closeted Crist & Out Ashburn on Homo-Mehlman & Same Sex Marriage Bans


     In the wake of former RNC chairman Ken Mehlman's coming out party, other gay Republican politicians are making their voices heard.  Of course, there's quite a disparity between those in and out of the closet.  (Those of you who watch the fair and balanced news rhetoric on FOX wouldn't know anything about this story.)


     Outgoing California State Senator Roy Ashburn, who came out only after getting caught with a boy-toy in a government-owned vehicle after getting wasted at a gay bar (MWM. GOP. DWI. LGBT. OMG.), said the following to On Top Magazine in response Mehlman's post-anti-gay-Republican-career coming out party:
     “I'm pleased for him,” Ashburn said, “because knowing what I've been through in trying to keep a secret for so many years and in trying to hide my secret, doing things that were hurtful to gay people, coming to the realization that you can actually admit who you truly are, and to stop the hiding and the actions around that which are hurtful … I mean that's a big breakthrough and I'm happy for him.”
     Then Roy took it one step further:
     “I would argue that the Republican party, because of the principles underlying Republicanism, really is the party that should be championing equal rights for gay people, for all people." 
     Roy, I'm not holding my breathalyser.  There are still more self-hating closeted Republican politicians in office and positions of power far greater than outgoing state senator that are doing far greater harm than which you and a handful of other openly gay Republicans could ever atone.

Image from Wonkette
     For example, take Florida Governor and U.S. Senate candidate Charlie Crist.  Here's what this well-groomed governor had to say to Ed Henry on CNN's State of the Union:
ED HENRY, HOST: You have previously said in your gubernatorial campaign, you supported a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. Now that you're trying to occupy the political center, are you still in favor of a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage?
CRIST: I feel the same way, yes, because I feel that marriage is a sacred institution, if you will. But I do believe in tolerance. I'm a live and let live kind of guy, and while I feel that way about marriage, I think if partners want to have the opportunity to live together, I don't have a problem with that...
HENRY: But governor, doesn't it sounds like you having it both ways [Jesus Crist!] by saying live and let live, but I also support a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. If it's live and let live, why would you ban same-sex marriage?
CRIST: Well, everything is in a matter of degree, Ed, and when it becomes to the institution of marriage, I believe that it is between a man and a woman, it's just how I feel.
     Sorry, Charlie, but our constitution isn't based upon feelings.  Courts rule on findings of fact and conclusions of law, not on how one group feels the rest of the country feels or should feel.

     Perhaps, Charlie the Crist, needs to brush up on his civics, by reading the federal court's decision that California Proposition 8 was unconstitutional.  In it, he would find the eighty findings of fact and additional conclusions of law that form the spine of the court's ruling, not feelings.

     On the other hand, David Blankenhorn and Kenneth Miller, the only two witness produced by the Yes on 8 proponents, gave testimony that did not hold up in court.  The Yes on 8 proponents did such a miserable job that the court found "the opinions of Blankenhorn to be unreliable and entitled to essentially no weight in court" and Miller's to be "entitled to little weight."

     Those of us fighting for marriage equality are thankful that the federal court's decision was not based upon an opinion-poll-election and political commercials overflowing with false witness, but was instead based upon the facts and testimony of the plaintiff's seventeen witnesses.

     Basing rules and laws on opinions and feelings might work in church, but they don't hold up in a court of law.

     Charlie Crist is a disgrace to the gay community.  It's time he follows Mehlman and Ashburn's lead by forsaking his homophobic, bigoted feelings.  Come out, for Crist's sake!

Sunday, August 29, 2010

Litany to a Broken Healthcare System

     Praise to our broken healthcare system!  Praise to the Republicans and Tea Party clan that are still fighting to block healthcare reform!  Praise to midterm elections!  Praise to rumors of death panels!  Praise and thanksgiving to Sarah Palin and Chuck Grassley forever!  Praise to those who would do away with unemployment insurance in the midst of the worst economic crisis in  eighty years!  Praise to the gods of for-profit medicine and insurance!  Praise to the insurance lobby, all glory and profit be yours forever and ever, amen!

     The current administration's health reform bill has not yet gone into effect.  Who knows if what I'm about to report would be different were the reformed plan in effect.  Until everyone has access to a public option for health insurance, what I'm about to report is probably going to remain the status quo.  Praise to the 37th best healthcare system in the world!
Image from Wikimedia

     SHE was fired a year ago from his job, and who knows if turning sixty and his health insurance premium going up by 25% had any effect upon his being let go.  SHE's been applying for jobs ever since, while working various part time gigs, that don't provide employee health insurance.  Four days before SHE was unexpectedly fired, I quit my job to return to graduate school.  My student loans were already drawn, and thanks to George Bush destroying Pell Grants and Republicans privatizing student loans, the majority of my loans were already accruing interest on the day SHE was fired.  We've been living on my student loans and work study, SHE's unemployment and part-time wages, and our retirement savings since.  Praise be to the American Dream!

     Thankfully, SHE had health insurance coverage through his old job over the past year.  Now that has expired.  Here's the true choice offered by the current "death panel" running our national healthcare system: choose between death to your financial security or possible death because you can't go to the doctor any more.  Praise to the myth of the free market offering healthcare choice!  Praise to spineless Democrats, who spent their mandate paying for an August Tea Party!

     I'm sure COBRA has helped some people, but not SHE.  In order to keep his previous job's health insurance coverage (which has high deductibles and horrendous prescription coverage) through COBRA, SHE would have to pay the following:

     Employee only: $1098.04/month  (This is actually, twice what SHE's employer paid one year ago, before he turned sixty.  Praise to unrestricted premium increases for the aged!)
     Employee and Spouse: $1349.15/month
     Employee and Children: $1349.15/month
     Employee, Spouse, and Children $2316.47/month
     When someone is unemployed, how are they supposed to have $1100/month to pay for health insurance? Imagine having a family and needing to pay over $2300/month.  That's nearly $28,000 per year.  All glory and honor to the prescription drug conglomerates!

     If you live in Los Angeles, with your children and have a meager two bedroom apartment for your housing in a moderately safe neighborhood, you're paying an average of $2665/month for housing.  That's an additional $32,000/year.  And, how do you move to a cheaper place when you owe one months rent down and one and a half months as a security deposit?  Praise to the rent control loop-holes, glory and honor them forever!

     So, you're unemployed and paying at total of $60,000 just to house your family and provide them with the possibility of healthcare.  Where do you get money for the deductibles and prescriptions?  Where do you get money for food, clothing, water, electricity, and natural gas?  Where is the money for school supplies, car insurance, apartment insurance, life insurance, etc. etc. etc.?  Praise to the Right Wing forever!

Map from In Context
     Praise to the American dream, where if you are rich or have a job (that happens to provide health insurance) you are spared, but if you are a hard working middle or lower class individual, you're left to the mercy of your employer, no matter how corrupt, unstable, racist, homophobic, misogynistic, sexually harassing, or psychotic that employer might be in order to have access to quality medical care.  Praise to part time jobs and forty hour a week jobs that refuse to offer insurance!  Praise to the system that the upper class politicians and their mindless fold want to preserve!  Praise, glory, and honor to their wallets, their multi-billion dollar industries, their family values, and their gods, forever! 

Inception Discussion: Who's Inceiving Whom?

     This is completely off blog-topic, but have any of you seen the film Inception?  I've been on the road so much this summer that I didn't get to see it until this weekend.  I think it's a movie that people probably either loved or hated.  I loved it.

     If you are interested in discussing it, please comment below.

     SPOILER ALERT:  DO NOT KEEP READING IF YOU DON'T WANT THE FILM'S ENDING RUINED.

     Here are a few of the theories that I have about the film.  These are initial theories, as I've only seen the film once.  I think the clue to what actually happened at the film's ending was in the first 15 minutes during Cobb's interactions with Saito. At that point in the film, we were still learning the rules and didn't know what the hell was going on. I think the clue to what really happened is in there.  I need to see it again.

1.  The Easy Ending

     My initial reaction to the ending was that the totem (top) was going to fall. I wanted Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) to have succeeded in his quest to get back to his children and for the movie to have been at face value.  However, if the ending was actually that simple they would have shown the top fall. 

2.  Cobb in Limbo Forever

     If I had to venture a guess... Perhaps Saito (Ken Watanabe) and Cobb remained archenemies like they were at the beginning of the film. When Saito beat and tortured Cobb's previous architect on the helicopter, he learned Cobb's secrets in order to use them against him: the circumstances of Mal's death (Marion Cotillard), the cause being the inception that he planted in her that she wasn't in the real world, and Cobb being unable to architect a dream.  Saito used Ariadne (Ellen Page) to extract the information about Cobb's totem so a fake one could be constructed in the dream.  (By the way, in Greek mythology Ariadne was King Midas' daughter.  She helped Theseus by giving him a sword to slay the Minotaur and also a ball of red fleece to lead him out of the Minotaur's labyrinth.  Sound familiar?)

     After that, Saito and Ariadne created a dream maze/labyrinth  in order to entrap Cobb in limbo.  A circular illusion like a never-ending staircase.  This dream mission was to plant an inception in Fisher (Cillian Murphy).  Another possible level to this theory is that Mal was the real baddie and architect of the entire plot, with the intention of entrapping Cobb forever.

     At the end of the film,when Cobb goes to save Saito in limbo, Saito plants the opposite inception of what Cobb had planted in Mal: the thought that Cobb's world is real. For the inception to work, the initial thought had to come from Cobb, which happened when he decided to go to limbo to save Saito right before Ariadne  jumped off the building. Cobb's decision and the thought, the need to make Saito honor their agreement, then leads Cobb to the idea that he completed the mission, the charges against him are lifted, and that he's returned home to live with his children in the real world. 

     But instead of waking up, Cobb was transferred from Saito's dream landscape into his own, trapped forever in his subconscious dream limbo, but thinking that it's real.  When old Saito picked up the gun at the end of the dream mission, while in limbo, he probably shot himself to wake up. We didn't see whether he shot Cobb first or not. So, there's an ambiguity here.  But in the end, the inception was about getting Cobb to believe something, not Fisher.  The top never falls.

2. Cobb Escapes Limbo

     After Mal died in the real world, Cobb retreated into his dreams and got stuck.  (He may have been one of the people in the basement of the chemist's building that were hooked up to the dream sharing machine because that world had become more real to them.  If that's the case, then perhaps the dream team, lead by Saito, Ariadne, and Arthur (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), etc. went into the dreamscape to rescue Cobb, by concocting the Fisher project.  

      The project was a front to get Cobb back into the real world.  By successfully planting the Inception in Fisher, as we saw in the film, Cobb believed that he was earning his freedom to return home to the United States, which lead him to believe that he would wake up and live in the real world.  The different levels of the Fisher mission, Ariadne counseling him to kill Mal, Cobb's need to save Saito so that Saito will honor the agreement and give him his freedom, all of these are part of getting Cobb to come to the thought that his life is worth living in the real world.  In this ending the top falls.

4. The Top is a Red Herring, Cobb's Ring Is the Real Totem

     As I was embedding hyperlinks in this post, I came across a theory worth checking out.  The key to reality, Cobb's totem, is not the top, but his wedding ring.  Check this theory out by linking here and scrolling down to comment #53 by Catharsis.  His theory is that the reason Christopher Nolan showed us the top not falling at the end, is to reveal to us that it's a red herring.

4.  The Audience Inception Twist -- the Point of the Ending in My Opinion

     From a structural perspective, the film had an ambiguous ending for a reason.  The top wobbled but didn't fall, because writer/director Christopher Nolan's brilliance wasn't about what happened in the characters, but in the viewers.  

     The twist was not about which inception was planted in which character, but which was planted in the viewer. The idea that each audience member grasped onto during the film determines how that person interprets the ending.  Therefore, the ending can be interpreted multiple ways.

     Art is about inception, the artist trying to convey an idea, emotion, or message through a medium.  Christopher Nolan succeeded as an artist, he planted ideas into the minds of his audience.  

5.  A Plea to Mr. Nolan

     Please, please, please, please, please, Christopher Nolan, do not make an sequel!  Don't pull a Matrix Reloaded.  Let Inception stand on it's own, with a universe that is still mysterious and open to interpretation.  

Let the top keep spinning!